Raising the stakes in permission marketing: The need to better manage enterprise e-mail processes
Jeremi Karnell, Founder & CMO | One to One Interactive
March 27, 2002
Overview
Similar to the early days of the Internet, when "brochureware"
web sites were popping up all over the enterprise, corporate e-mail
campaigns today tend to originate from multiple and often
unconnected channels within an organization: sales, web, direct
marketing, customer service, and in some cases, business partners.
To make matters even more complicated, e-mail recipients are often
given the choice of multiple response paths, including call center,
online, and/or brick and mortar establishments. While it is
desirable for all departments to be able to leverage the efficiency
of the online channel, managing multiple outbound campaigns and
their resulting inbound responses is a real challenge — one that
needs to be addressed at a corporate level in order to ensure
success.
The problem is that most organizations are not structured to
manage the above process. Traditional approaches to sales and
marketing do a poor job at addressing the sophisticated,
cross-functional online/offline requirements that are inherent in a
best-in-class e-mail program. A recent study by IMT Strategies
titled Enterprise Permission Marketing: Best Practices for Managing
Targeted E-Mail Programs Across the Organization states that "…E
-Mail marketing managers complain that they are struggling to
govern marketing programs and enforce meaningful permission
policies on an enterprise level while at the same time growing
their e-lists into the millions to stay ahead of the competition."
The IMT study went on to uncover several important issues
that are critical to the long-term viability of the e-mail channel,
and must be addressed when crafting corporate e-mail strategies.
Two key findings include:
- There is a growing gap between customer expectations for
permission marketing and the permission marketing programs that
Global 2000 marketers deliver
- Without better process and policy management, many marketers
risk destroying the e-mail channel before it has time to
mature
The gap between customer expectations and Global 2000 programs
Current research reveals that online customers are raising the bar
for what constitutes "best-in-class" permission marketing. This
trend is true even with new online users – 54% say they receive too
many e-mails, compared with 33% just a year ago (see Figure 1).
Beyond feeling that they receive too much e-mail, users are also
frustrated by untargeted, poorly timed, and irrelevant e-mails.
Figure 1 (Source: Forrester Research, Effective E-Mail
Marketing 2001)
Consumers are also putting pressure on State and National
Legislators to start to regulate how marketers us the e-mail
channel. 16 States have passed a total of 18 pieces of legislation
to address e-mail marketing. Congress is reviewing two bills
concerning Spam and privacy issues. Although, the main thrust of
these laws is to protect individuals against fraudulent uses of
e-mail, their reach extends to those marketers who us e-mail for
legitimate means (i.e. communicating with their opt-in customer
base, customer care efforts, etc.) and will effect how campaigns
are executed.
In order for marketers to address the growing dissatisfaction
consumers are feeling towards e-mail marketing, they need to:
- Develop e-mail conversations, not campaigns
- Segment customers based on their motivations that
incorporate multiple profile dimensions
- Sequence e-mail delivery according to the user's
buying/care cycle (i.e. Casual Shopping vs. Active Researching
vs. Ready to Buy)
- Standardize the Opt-In/Opt-Out Process both online and
offline
- Gradually deepen level of permission with the users
- Ask about interest and preferences for frequency of
contact
- Enable user-specified communication, content and product
preference registration
- Modify messages and tone for the target audience
- Personalize as much as possible
- Globalize and Localize content for International
recipients
According to the IMT Study, most marketers in the Global 2000
lack the sophistication to execute most of the above practices. It
goes on to state that if efforts are not made to meet rising user
expectations, future e-mail marketing efforts will result in
diminished campaign performance, weaker online customer
relationships and even brand damage.
Lack of process and policy management threatens to destroy the e-mail channel
While it is true that most organizations have established basic
privacy and opt-out policies, most still do not have anyone that
has taken full charge of the channel at the executive level. This
lack of oversight has resulted in most enterprises operating
without controls or policies in place governing how employees
handle e-mail as it relates to marketing. The absence of executive
leadership further contributes to poor targeting (relevancy) and
over communication (frequency). These are the "two issues most
likely to make customers "opt-out" of e-mail relationships or
simply delete the message".
Figure 2 (Source: IMT Strategies Benchmark Survey of
Marketers 2001)
IMT believes that organizations will need to take the
following key steps in order to harness the power of e-mail
marketing through better process management:
-
Put an Enterprise E-Mail Process in Place:Define a role
for e-mail and lay out an enterprise process for managing the
e-mail channel. This process should extend from e-mail address
acquisition and maintenance activities, through e-mail campaign
planning and execution to measurement/analytics and policy
administration;
-
Put Someone in Charge of this Process:Appoint a VP of
e-mail marketing to govern policies across the enterprise, manage
the e-mail channel and hold agencies and business units
accountable for performance;
-
Create a Policy Blueprint for Success:Architect policies
that will pave the way for sustainable revenue growth, cost
reduction and relationship enhancement;
-
Get the Right Help from the Outside:Evaluate solutions
providers and agencies based on their ability to support
permission marketing business processes across the
enterprise;
-
Measure E-Mail Campaign Performance and Channel
Economics:Put in place meaningful measures of e-mail
campaign and channel performance that align with both business
objectives and return;
-
Develop and Bottle E-Mail Best Practices:Codify e-mail
campaign best practices across the organization to move up the
learning curve faster;
-
Formalize E-Mail Budget and Resource Allocation:Make
permission e-mail programs part of the corporate planning and
budget process.
Conclusion
While it is imperative for enterprises to apply better professional
management approaches towards the use of e-mail and define and fix
the marketing process that support its use, these are just the
beginning steps. Future success will require e-mail to be
integrated into broader CRM initiatives and integrated as part of a
"multl-channel" online/offline marketing approach.
Furthermore, agencies, third-party e-mail specialists, ASPs
and media networks that today only provide third-party list buying,
partial campaign support and transmission services are going to
need to evolve to be able to meet the more sophisticated needs of
marketers. This will include the ability to strategically help
enterprises with business-process re-engineering in order to meet
e-mail marketing best practices, technical expertise in integrating
CRM and personalization systems into the permission marketing
process and advanced database/analytical services (to name a few).
Finally, enterprises will need to allow their customers and
prospects to have much greater control over their permission
relationships. This will require the development of a secure and
easy to use e-mail management center connected to their corporate
website where individuals may opt-in/opt-out of e-mail
communications, choose the type of content they wish to receive,
select the format and frequency of the e-mails they receive, and
access customer care if necessary.
back to White Papers
|